Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by kioleanu on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @07:29AM (#35973816)

that is a truck-load of assumptions

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by medo-bear on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @08:24AM (#35974274)

possibilities*

yet accusation of fraud is not an assumption?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @10:48AM (#35975983)

I think it's fair to say that an accusation in court is not an assumption, yes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by medo-bear on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @11:52AM (#35977101)

you must have an assumption in order to have an accusation, what's not clear?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by Dylan16807 on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @02:15PM (#35979178)

Someone bringing a suit will typically research things quite well and not have assumptions about core elements by the time they file. And sometimes there never was speculation at all. What do you mean "must"?

More to the point, even if you want to call it an assumption a median lawsuit is a lot more thorough than something a commenter guesses offhand as they post. The two are leagues apart whether or not you use the same word.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Quad9’s Opinion of the Recent Court Ruling in Leipzig by medo-bear on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @03:38PM (#35980170)

I don't think you know what assumption means. Let me help you out. He assumed they commited fraud. Based on that assumption he took them to court. He reasearched his case so well that, by the sound of it, the judge laughed him out of the court with a personal anecdote. He then went to HN to bad mouth the judge assuming he is incompetant. Much research

[ Parent | on HN ]