A guidance language for controlling LLMs

Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs by nomel on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @09:09PM (#35970081)

This is true for something like raw GPT. For the chat models that have been specifically optimized for "you" prompts, this is false. See the discussion in the link I provided, along with the leaked copilot/bing prompts.

Or, in other words, use a model in a way that fully takes advantage of how it was specifically optimized, from the intentional burning of massive amounts of compute time/money to get it that way.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs by startupsfail on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @03:52PM (#35980384)

Bing prompt is hilarious. And so wrong in so many ways.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs by nomel on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @07:30PM (#35982535)

I would assume that OpenAI helped with the Microsoft prompt. Being Microsoft, and it being a front page feature, I would also assume that there are miles of powerpoint showing data in support for it.

What do you see as a better prompt? How would you test its efficacy?

[ Parent | on HN ]