Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs
by startupsfail on Tuesday May 16, 2023 @06:17PM
(#35968518)
If you see any prompt that starts with You, generally it is a poor design. Like using a “goto” or global variables.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
This is true for something like raw GPT. For the chat models that have been specifically optimized for "you" prompts, this is false. See the discussion in the link I provided, along with the leaked copilot/bing prompts.
Or, in other words, use a model in a way that fully takes advantage of how it was specifically optimized, from the intentional burning of massive amounts of compute time/money to get it that way.
Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs
by startupsfail on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @03:52PM
(#35980384)
Bing prompt is hilarious. And so wrong in so many ways.
I would assume that OpenAI helped with the Microsoft prompt. Being Microsoft, and it being a front page feature, I would also assume that there are miles of powerpoint showing data in support for it.
What do you see as a better prompt? How would you test its efficacy?
Re:A guidance language for controlling LLMs
by Jorengarenar on Wednesday May 17, 2023 @12:34AM
(#35971286)
Yeah, GOTO or global variables are usually a not so good idea... except in cases where those are actually the best tools for the job and any alternative makes code actually worse.
Coincidentally, the same applies to "you"