News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Three Companies Impersonated Millions to Influence Intern... by bombcar on Sunday May 14, 2023 @12:57AM (#35935438)
There’s something there - Netflix had just moved to a tier 2/3 provider and they weren’t peered well and Netflix was trying to get the big ISPs to peer instead of selling transit - peering for an almost entirely one way connection. The t1s weren’t having it.

The moment Netflix setup caching servers in isp COs around the world they stopped caring about net neutrality. Strange.

Re:Three Companies Impersonated Millions to Influence Intern... by zamnos on Sunday May 14, 2023 @02:06AM (#35935707)
Netflix couldn't know what the outcome was going to be, so they hedged by creating a technical solution to the problem. They still pay the ISPs, but for colo services instead of the net neutrality ransom. The problem with paying ransom is it'll just keep going up. Colo services could also keep going up, but it's much more constrained because there's an actual good/service being provided and not just paying money to change a firewall/QoS box rule.
Re:Three Companies Impersonated Millions to Influence Intern... by ShroudedNight on Sunday May 14, 2023 @03:10AM (#35936001)
My understanding was that the retail ISP monopolies were refusing Netflix's caching servers unless Netflix agreed to pay 'value'-priced access contracts.
Re:Three Companies Impersonated Millions to Influence Intern... by esjeon on Sunday May 14, 2023 @06:37AM (#35936968)
Caching can delay the net neutrality issue by NOT serving the contents from the first party. ISPs peering Netflix won't suffer the heavy traffic (thus no reason to charge tons of money), and ISPs that hosts caches can achieve higher QoS for their customers and also can possibly charge other peers who don't host caches. It's a win-win strategy.