You did, when you accused me of being a shill. (Perhaps the resulting toxicity is precisely the reason why there is a rule against accusing someone of being a shill.)
btw, here's a link [0] to their documentation page which includes a video of the "co-founder of logicloop," featuring her "name and face" (the absence of which you found so suspicious about the blog posts).
It took me two minutes of clicking to find this page and make the determination the site is probably not "spam." If anything, it's a vaporware landing page intended to validate a product that doesn't fully exist yet. And perhaps it shouldn't be a Show HN since you can't immediately try the product. But I think it's definitely unfair to classify the submission as "spam" based on some indicators that don't even apply to it (you say there is no name and face, but I just linked you to a video with the name and face of the cofounder).
Do you think I alone was responsible for this getting flagged? Maybe go check out this website and come back with a clean perspective before trying to argue with me. As you can see, it is getting you nowhere.
That's what I just did. After clicking for two minutes, I found a video with the author's name and face, which directly contravenes the primary evidence you cited (lack of name and face on blog posts) for the site being spam. The documentation also includes screenshots of the product.
Like I said, I'd be willing to concede it might be a vaporware landing page that is collecting demo leads, and therefore ineligible for a Show HN. But as far as I can tell, the author is a real person and there is at least some work behind the product, as demonstrated by the existence of a website, documentation and explainer videos.