News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by MBCook on Thursday May 11, 2023 @12:01AM (#35897254)
They knew before I turned on incognito in the YT app. I just don’t want that one bit erased.
Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by usui on Thursday May 11, 2023 @12:18AM (#35897402)
I dislike YouTube as much as the next person, but do you understand how unreasonable of an ask this is when you are explicitly going into incognito mode? I echo everyone else's sentiment here.
Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by xkgt on Thursday May 11, 2023 @12:49AM (#35897666)
I don't know why everyone is fixated on the term incognito. I believe what GP wants (and me too) is to pause watching history or to at least exclude a viewing session from the recommendation algorithm.
Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by usui on Thursday May 11, 2023 @01:39AM (#35898051)
Let's discuss this feature some more?

The reason users such as yourself want this feature is because you don't have faith in the recommendation algorithm, right? If you watched a video and Google started pushing related videos that you don't want to constantly see, and you clicked on the "do not recommend this kind of video" option, and it /actually/ worked, would you be satifised without this "exclude from recommendation algorithm" mode?

If so, the better solution here would be to have a recommendation system that isn't garbage. I admit I kind of fancy this described mode, but the only reason is because I don't currently trust Google to actually respect my expressed discontent. And if we don't trust Google to have a faithful recommendation system, why would we be willing to trust YouTube Premium?

Re:YouTube tests blocking videos unless you disable ad blockers by bagacrap on Saturday May 13, 2023 @12:35AM (#35925562)
If that bit is a literal bit, there will be an extension that just sets that bit, thereby bypassing ads when you didn't actually pay a subscription.

If that bit is some sort of encoded identifier that an extension couldn't generate, then they will know who you are.