No need to look for external causes, although blaming external actors also aligns with American historical actions.
* does China/Russia benefit from furthering destabilizing narratives?
if they can do it and they benefit from doing it…they are doing it.
Took less than a minute to find.
We acknowledge that mistakes can happen despite our best efforts to ensure accuracy. However, rest assured that we are taking immediate action to address the issue at hand. We are conducting a thorough investigation to identify the root cause and implement safeguards to prevent similar occurrences in the future.
Our goal has always been to serve as a trusted source of information, and we understand the weight of that responsibility. We appreciate your understanding and patience during this time, as we work diligently to restore your faith in our services.
We value your feedback and encourage you to share any concerns or suggestions you may have. Your input is invaluable in helping us improve our services and ensure that such errors do not repeat themselves.
Outside of where?
But it's also plausible that like OP says outside influences take advantage of the condition being present.
No foreign influence required.
The best kind of misinformation is misinformation that is true but not representative of the real situation. Have you checked our heart disease deaths? It is *factually* an issue many orders of magnitude more important to the average American. And yet…zero discussion seems to happen about it online?
And why wouldn’t there be foreign influence? It’s quite an easy checklist:
* do Russia and China have the technical capability to make social media accounts and post in English?: Yes, obviously.
* do Russia and China have any motive to drive fearful divisive narratives in the US?: Yes - we are their primary geopolitical opponent
With both of these true, to assume they’re not doing it for some reason out of kindness requires a lot of mental gymnastics.
https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/crim...
Thats my entire point. You’re talking about something that simply does not exist. But when nearly all of the online discourse acts as if we are less safe now, it’s easy to believe that is true. Even being aware of the statistics sometimes I feel that way.
Sensationalist media has always been a thing. Yet, at the exact same time geopolitical opponents were given a direct input to the media consumed by the average American, sentiment becomes much more negative.
Not foreign influence, but simply that fear and outrage sells.
I.e. they are 100%, without a doubt, doing just that
Let's be serious. Yellow Journalism was thriving in its modern birthplace of USA long before PRC or RF even existed.
Demand from consumers who interact with the internet.
Consumers who, on the internet, ONLY see upvoted comments about masa shootings and see anything talking about the more deadly issue of heart disease/obesity downvoted and mocked.