I understand standards and think many are great.
I understand the lightening standard show it's age and is in need of an upgrade. Why the EU is involved in the decision making process is lost to me.
Having one gate keeper (for example "Made for iPhone" USDx per device / cable) profiting off this isn't good and isn't conscionable from a public policy perspective; it would amount to a private benefit imposed tax.
So the EU are, in effect, voting in their own self interest. And again it's not just the cables, but the chargers as well; the EU forced mobile phone companies to stop packaging chargers with phones as well.
Apple just blocks to lock you in their ecosystem.
Can I use a USB stick over lighting port? Last time I tried it was quite a hussle.
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/guide/iphone/iph95baac91f/io...
It never occurred to me to do that but it's nice to have the option.
https://www.bestbuy.com/site/searchpage.jsp?id=pcat17071&st=...
That, or you could accept that USBC is fine and that there is absolutely no needed improvement that cannot be done in the form of USB-C. Slapping magnets on USBC is not prohibited if that's what your heart desires. In the mean time, you'll live with charging your phone with 100W, I promise.
The fact that you see a port simply as way to charge instead of study in usability is why I dismiss this argument.
There.
By your own logic, you couldn't oppose the government forcing every GPU to have a VGA port, or every NVMe drive to have a sata port because hey do you also oppose standardizing 240v???
Just slap in a USBC too.
The lightning cable has whatever Apple wants on the other end.
These apple fanatics are so funny when they keep insisting that their shitty 2010 tech is bleeding edge.
OK, just buy phones with one port. I think you're just experiencing FOMO because it's possible that you could end up with a port that's not The Best or having to buy a less aesthetic phone.