News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Socialist Calculation Debate by dukeyukey on Monday May 01, 2023 @03:30PM (#35777908)
Spending on healthcare rose faster in the US than pretty much anywhere else, at the same time American life expectancy growth slowed down compared to peer nations.

I dunno what went wrong but something did.

Re:The Socialist Calculation Debate by ajross on Monday May 01, 2023 @04:29PM (#35778704)
Spending everywhere rose much faster than inflation, though it's true more in the US. And life expectancy in the US rose very rapidly through the 60's and 70's, the period under discussion. It wasn't until the late 80's that we started to fall off the curve.[1]

Your final sentence is just the same point upthread: you want a simple coincidence[2] to make your argument.

[1] There is a ton of analysis and argument to do there too, but suffice it to say that "because medicare" is just as terrible an explanation.

[2] It's not even a coincidence! Desire for government-guaranteed health care came about precisely because of and simultaneous to the availability of late-life care that actually worked. No one wanted medicare in the 20's because there wasn't anything to pay for even if you had it. But they damn sure wanted their walkers and hip replacements in the 60's.

Re:The Socialist Calculation Debate by dukeyukey on Monday May 01, 2023 @05:19PM (#35779315)
No, I literally do not know what went wrong or when. I'm not trying to make a point about government-provided anything. Although government-provided healthcare began quite a bit earlier than that, as early as the 1880s in Germany, but definitely in the 1940s when the UK NHS started.