Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by daniel_reetz on Monday May 01, 2023 @11:58AM
(#35774693)
It's not allowed. These are old plumes and they stay around for a long time and are very expensive to clean up.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by whamlastxmas on Monday May 01, 2023 @12:12PM
(#35774915)
Cool, let’s make the companies that caused it pay for it
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by mrguyorama on Monday May 01, 2023 @01:23PM
(#35776089)
That's clearly socialism and making companies pay for damage they cause and their externalaties is oppressive regulation. We should instead reduce the EPA's power until they are a shell of an organization. How else are we going to get our burning rivers back?
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by zymhan on Monday May 01, 2023 @01:33PM
(#35776247)
That's why we have the EPA Superfund program
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by Fatnino on Monday May 01, 2023 @02:00PM
(#35776656)
Santa Clara county has the most superfund sites.
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by red-iron-pine on Monday May 01, 2023 @03:59PM
(#35778319)
There are a lot of superfund sites, man. And it sucks that the FeddyGov is on the hook to cleanup the mess that big corps make.
Re:Michael J. Fox Foundation Announces Breakthrough for Park...
by acchow on Monday May 01, 2023 @05:04PM
(#35779116)
It should be renamed "minifund" given how small the fund is today and how few sites they actually clean up
The reinstatement of the excise tax in 2022 may actually be harmful to its own environment. It's an import tax on crude oil, which will encourage the domestic oil industry leading to an importing of pollution.