Access to high-quality internet resources is absolutely a luxury. You can pick and choose what resources you want, it's not TV.

It's like saying that access to a well-stocked university library is not a privilege because most pop books that get published are crap. It's not even the same category of "book".

Negatives of the internet do exist but you're overstating your case. This is about getting basic resources to people who couldn't otherwise access them, I don't see how it can possibly be net negative.

This is an outrageous claim lol.

I don’t post to make friends.

Edit: Follow up thought, I’m not sure who the internet benefits anymore. It used to be about users. Now I don’t feel the same way.

I mean, you basically out of hand disregard the infinite potential network connectivity grants you to learn nearly anything to a good level.

Languages? State department language courses are available online, as are many other resources, language classes, language learning communities, etc.

Math? Physics? Chemistry? Again, infinite repository of info.

And so on...

The internet may be full of scams and IP theft, but it also allows people to fulfill their impulse to post, so who is to say that it’s bad?

The privilege is in being able to not have Internet access for an extended period and just enjoy life from a tropical beach, sipping on a mai tai, with no work to check-in on to make sure nothing's blown up. From the first world, only the middle class and higher can afford such a luxury. But the Internet is just so damned useful that, sure, it enables doomscrolling, but it enables so much more as a communication medium (the MVP for many businesses is a email address or a whatsapp number) that the assertion is just ignorant of life before the Internet.

Well, some content available through the internet is useful. That content was available on CD-ROMs in the '90s as encyclopedias.

The function provided with this project is some content available offline just like those CD-ROMs. You aren't going to be communicating with folks on the other side of the world via it. Ergo, it is not "the internet in a box".

> From the first world, only the middle class and higher can afford such a luxury.

That is a HN perspective.

Blue collar shift workers often leave the work at work, and don't 'hop on a call' outside work. I took a 4x10 shift job and it has good benefits and pays enough for vacations. For the extravagant luxuries, TGFBtc.

Also starting to believe that the real status symbol will be the ability to not have an internet connection or only connect at your own discretion.

I also see a lot of temptation especially in the IoT space to use the internet to control the devices against the users wishes and spy on the user.

You also see tge first attempts of devicemakers to actively ensure an internet connection themselves, independently of what the user set up. (I.e. Apple's Find My network, Amazon's Sidewalk, etc).

I don't think this will become less in the future.

Thanks, I think we need to discuss this too. I don't believe we can wish the internet away, but we're still in internet infancy, the "wild west" of plugged in, always online, life. Regulators need to catch up, but at the moment they seem to miss the point, mainly trying to cash in and serve their own narrow interests.

We likely need a movement that promotes a healthier use of the tech, which could include things like making it socially unacceptable to be constantly hooked up to your phone, and hefty fines for the manufacturers whenever their hardware/software made clandestine surveillance possible.

If things like these are not technically or socially possible, then I'm guessing we'll see an "anti-internet" movement eventually, too.

Actually, such local "internet in the box" as per the linked article might prove to be a basis for one such "anti-internet" solution: detach from the internet as a whole and enable local communication, resources and traffic only.

Every prepper should really have one!

What's old is new again: if everyone has their own isolated network, then if you need message exchange, you can light up FIDO or UUCP!

Look how few projects containing valuable knowledge are available offline. There's less and less stuff that can work offline.

I have a similar feeling. I think there is a definite lifecycle to consumer technology (on the internet you have things like wikipedia, youtube, social media, google search, but this also applies to things like smart phones, operating systems, tvs even).

These things all seem to follow a curve. They are released, adopted and improved, they become amazing, and then at some point they start to decline for whatever reason (even as they may be improving in some aspects - like smart tvs continue to get a better picture but only if you can stomach the extra ads, surveillance, and otherwise creepy anti features).

I wish I could just have windows 7 with security updates, a dumb tv with an awesome screen, almost no subscriptions or cloud based doodads.

Id love a frozen version of the internet that nobody can come along and ruin for whatever reason. Internet in a box seems like a good idea to me.

Oh boi. Don't ever go outside your home because you may get robbed, stabbed, spat on, laughed at, run over, kidnapped, etc. And even worse things await unsupervised children! No fun can be had outside and all knowledge must be carefully curated.

Ugh.

This does not connect to the internet.