I actually could dig up my own contract from years ago (ugh, the effort though) but Confidentiality clause is in there, and it was made clear during on-boarding what is expected from employees: don't share any internal info unless you're an authorized company representative.
Here's a list of recent state laws in Washington, Oregon, and Maine, which prohibition certain kinds of NDAs (oriented toward unlawful activity, not general speech rights): https://www.foley.com/en/insights/publications/2022/07/sever...
Contracts are required to be 'reasonable' for both parties. This puts limits on the ability to constrain in a contract. I don't know how much this reasonableness standard is statutory or judicial.
For public-sector employees there's some protection under the first amendment. https://www.workplacefairness.org/retaliation-public-employe...
And in Connecticut this free speech protection transfers to private-sector employees too: https://law.justia.com/codes/connecticut/2005/title31/sec31-...
https://www.natlawreview.com/article/free-speech-and-express...
https://www.pullcom.com/working-together/there-are-limits-to... > there is no statutory protection if the employee was only complaining about personal matters, such as the terms or conditions of employment. The employee has to show that he was commenting on a matter of public concern, rather than attempting to resolve a private dispute with the employer.
"Workplace conditions" is protected similarly to wages.
All he says is his concern about "optics", which has nothing to do with contract.
If Google has a problem with his post, they can go after him, but that's an issue between Google and him, not with you or me or the rest of the internet.
I'm definitely struggling to see what any of this has to do with personal integrity, betrayal, or squeezing personal benefit. To the contrary, it simply seems informative and he's sharing knowledge just to be helpful. Unless I've missed something, I don't see anything revealed that would harm Google or his former teammates here. No leaks of what's coming down the pipeline, no scandals, nothing of the sort.
People are allowed to share opinions of their previous employment and generally describe the broad outlines of their work and where they worked. This isn't a situation of working for the CIA with top-secret clearance.