Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by lwkl on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:17AM
(#35651404)
> edit: oh I just clicked the link someone posted (in a [Dead] comment), it seems he has removed the functionality I described
Your browser probably just doesn’t send the referer header to protect your privacy.
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by majou on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:18AM
(#35651409)
Still has the referrer troll.
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by smcl on Friday April 21, 2023 @06:38AM
(#35651903)
Weirdly I am now seeing it again. I don't know what happened :-S
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by account42 on Friday April 21, 2023 @05:37AM
(#35651545)
> I would link to the article but JWZ shows requests with referer "news.ycombinator.com" an image that you may not like if you're at work :)
IMO anyone who has not configured their browser not to send cross-domain Referer headers deserves whatever they get. There is no user benefit for this privacy leak and browsers should have trashed it decades ago.
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by anthk on Friday April 21, 2023 @06:35AM
(#35651890)
Gregory Casamento needs to build a GNUStep PPA for Ubuntu based distros, it would work great on libre derivatives such as Trisquel. Parabola has badly maintained repos for it, lacking even Gorm and ProjectCenter.
We need a DE for legacy devices as XFCE's development is not a sure thing with further GTK+ releases tied to Gnome and Red Hat.
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by hedora on Friday April 21, 2023 @09:10AM
(#35653180)
> I think it's a little unfair of him to single out young developers
Yeah, though I think of “teenage” more as a mindset in this case.
Re:Inkscape is hiring: Accelerating the GTK4 migration
by pmontra on Friday April 21, 2023 @10:50AM
(#35654614)
Sometimes it's easier to rewrite a module, given inputs and outputs and a good test suite, than to understand how it works. This is even more true if the original developer is no more available.
Rewriting a whole big library, not easy either way.
I think it's a little unfair of him to single out young developers, but I have seen the 1.x -> 2.x rewrite before too so he's not wrong overall. If you want to read the original article search for "The CADT Model" - I would link to the article but JWZ shows requests with referer "news.ycombinator.com" an image that you may not like if you're at work :)
edit: oh I just clicked the link someone posted (in a [Dead] comment), it seems he has removed the functionality I described