As far as I know, the exception to this is the bar exam, which GPT-4 can also pass, but that exam plays into GPT-4's strengths much more than other professional exams.
FWIW, this is more true for CA than most states.
Either it's a really obscure usage of the word or I got the president wrong.
Signed,
Guess Who"
That is not an instance of passing a standardized academic test through "autocompletion" or "regurgitation." It's rudimentary synthetic thought.
If it had named a different president, I could have argued with it, which is what I find especially interesting.
Making GPT sit it is like getting someone with no knowledge but a computer full of past questions and answers and a search button to sit the exam. It has metaphorical written it’s answers on it’s arm.
It knows a lot of stuff, but it can't do much thinking, so the minute your problem and its solution are far enough off the well-trodden path, its logic falls apart. Likewise, it's not especially good at math. It's great at understanding your question and replying with a good plain-english answer, but it's not actually thinking
It's able to define new concepts and new words. It's masters have gone to great lengths to prevent it from writing out particular types of judgements (eg https://sharegpt.com/c/uPztFv1). Hell, it's got a great imagination if you look at all the hallucinations it produces.
All of that sum up to many thinking-adjacent things, if not actual thinking! It all really hinges on your definition of thinking.
See GPT4's reply to pclmulqdq at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35648144 .
That's not a response from someone who wrote the answers on the inside of their elbow before coming to class. That's genuine inductive reasoning at a level you wouldn't get from quite a few real, live human students. GPT4 is using its general knowledge to speculate on the answer to a question that has possibly never been asked before, certainly not in those particular words.
(Shrug) Exactly the same as with a human child.
Unlike a human child who tends to know when you are lying to them.
LOL. If that were true, it might have saved Fox News $800 million. Nobody would bother lying, either to children or to adults, if it didn't work as well as it does.
>pushing the bottom out of the labor market and actively making the lives of the poorest worse in order to line their own pockets.
This makes zero sense. GPT4 has little effect on a janitor or truck driver. It doesn't pick fruit, or wash cars.