Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by moffkalast on Thursday April 20, 2023 @08:48AM
(#35639123)
Still waiting for someone to convert an international oil rig to a lawless data center. Or like that submarine base that Microsoft did.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by Nextgrid on Thursday April 20, 2023 @08:53AM
(#35639181)
Governments can and will just criminalize the act of peering with them, so any ISP/transit provider will be liable if they peer. Problem solved.
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by roblabla on Thursday April 20, 2023 @09:05AM
(#35639321)
You'd need every government to agree not to peer with them, otherwise you'd just route to whoever has agreed to peer. You might get shit latency, but it'd still work.
Getting everyone to agree not to peer seems like a rather tall order.
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by FormulatedEdits on Thursday April 20, 2023 @09:06AM
(#35639326)
In case you hadn’t seen this story, which I believe fits a similar bill, here is the case of the Cyberbunker. This took place in the Netherlands.
Darknet Diaries has an (excellent, as always) episode about it. If it wasn’t that podcast it might have been Malicious Life.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/08/03/the-cold-war-b...
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by Terretta on Thursday April 20, 2023 @09:17AM
(#35639476)
You might enjoy the book Cryptomnicon which is remarkably truthalized.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/03/sealand-and-have...
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by Xylakant on Thursday April 20, 2023 @08:53AM
(#35639172)
Your a bit more than 20 years late with the oil rig idea https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
Re:Mullvad VPN was subject to a search warrant
by bingobongodude on Thursday April 20, 2023 @08:53AM
(#35639171)
You mean Sealand?