News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Google They Are No... by ilyt on Saturday April 15, 2023 @06:53PM (#35585460)
the reversed DNS name part is a bit silly tho
Re:Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Google They Are No... by matja on Saturday April 15, 2023 @10:23PM (#35586673)
Can you elaborate what is silly about it? The reversing, or the DNS, or both?

A package called com.example.foo would be package foo in the namespace "example", which is under the namespace "com", which is how a lot of languages do namespace nesting.

DNS can be said to be "reversed" from that point of view.

Re:Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Google They Are No... by astrange on Sunday April 16, 2023 @12:23AM (#35587250)
It's all part of Java's effort to make everything as complicated as possible and put everything in as many namespaces as possible.
Re:Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Google They Are No... by oblio on Monday April 17, 2023 @03:44AM (#35597834)
Why? Because you don't like it?

Chesterton's fence.