Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by 27153 on Friday April 14, 2023 @09:43AM
(#35569494)
I don’t think EAs are focused on assigning credit here. It’s very consequentialist; they would say “it doesn’t matter who saved the 100 lives, it matters that they were saved.”
Re:What's the Least Impactful Way to Spend $300,000,000?
by vintermann on Saturday April 15, 2023 @10:28AM
(#35580920)
It matters if the 100 lives are suddenly 200 lives when you sum them up. It matters for decision making. It matters for questions like "should I rather do it myself or start a foundation to convince as many other people as possible to do it".
One glaring obvious problem with the EA people, is that they double count.
Say I give money for bed nets, and the bed nets save 100 lives.
But say I only gave that money because Eliezer Yudkowsky convinced me to. Was it really him that saved 100 lives? Or do we divide them between us somehow? How many should go to the people who actually distributed the bed nets I paid for?
You'd think the EA people would have good answers to these questions. Or at least, any answers. But they don't. Not any consistent ones. They cheerfully double-count in all their most famous arguments.