News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by edw519 on Sunday February 05, 2012 @09:52AM (#3554155)
(0) For every fundamental truth, there exists a counterexample:

(1) It Has To Work.

Counterexample: U.S. healthcare.

(2a) No matter how hard you try, you can't make a baby in much less than 9 months.

Counterexample: adoption.

(3) With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

Counterexample: Who cares? </resumes eating his BLT>

(4) Some things in life can never be fully appreciated nor understood unless experienced firsthand.

Counterexample: Microsoft Windows.

(5) It is always possible to aglutenate multiple separate problems into a single complex interdependent solution. In most cases this is a bad idea.

Counterexample: U.S. Constitution.

6. It is easier to move a problem around (for example, by moving the problem to a different part of the overall network architecture) than it is to solve it.

Counterexample: Joe Biden's speeches.

(7a) (corollary). Good, Fast, Cheap: Pick any two (you can't have all three).

Counterexample: Five Guys.

(8) It is more complicated than you think.

Counterexample: "All you lawyers do is complicate situations that aren't complicated." - Erin Brokovich

9. For all resources, whatever it is, you need more.

Counterexample: calories.

(10) One size never fits all.

Counterexample: Pencil and paper.

(11) Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and a different presentation, regardless of whether it works.

Counterexample: suicide.

(12) In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.

Counterexample: Hacker News.

Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by ars on Sunday February 05, 2012 @02:39PM (#3554963)
Your counterexamples for the most part make make no sense. I feel like I should give a line by line rebuttal, but that's probably giving your joke more attention that it deserves.
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by b_erb on Sunday February 05, 2012 @06:12AM (#3553829)
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=1925&eid...

Mark Nottingham's update on the speed of light.

Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by sargun on Sunday February 05, 2012 @08:38AM (#3554011)
Number 2 should have the subpoint "You must travel along the curvature of the Earth" - that is, until we get IP over neutrino.

Honestly, even for a joke-RFC, this is pretty spot on.

Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by tawm on Sunday February 05, 2012 @07:32AM (#3553909)
"It seems that perfection is attained not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing more to remove." – Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by dexen on Sunday February 05, 2012 @05:51AM (#3553808)
I love how ``It is always possible to add another level of indirection'' is described as corollary to moving problems around instead of solving them :D
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by seigel on Sunday February 05, 2012 @09:20AM (#3554081)
Love it. Ahh, those lighter more fun days. Try getting an RFC like that in there now.
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by rmccue on Sunday February 05, 2012 @08:41PM (#3555878)
It was an April Fools' Day RFC, which they do at least one of every year:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC

Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by DanBC on Sunday February 05, 2012 @09:28AM (#3554093)
I particularly like the tribute to Postel:

(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2468)

Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by dfc on Sunday February 05, 2012 @05:09PM (#3555439)
April Fools Day is bad enough why are we reliving it on HN again and again?
Re:RFC 1925: The Twelve Networking Truths by mariuolo on Sunday February 05, 2012 @05:02PM (#3555414)
Twelve truths and a misspelling (aglutenate).