Re:Twitter “no longer exists” as a company, merges into Musk...
by namaria on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @06:37PM
(#35532583)
The greed motive has nothing to do with conspicuous consumption or work ethics, or risk management. He is most definitely motivated by greed, regardless of how he expends the money or perceive risk. I'd go further and say no one who lives on a salary can really grasp how a billionaire calculates risk.
Re:Twitter “no longer exists” as a company, merges into Musk...
by v0idzer0 on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @07:20PM
(#35533058)
In my experience, people who start companies for the money always fail, because their conviction is weak. Especially risky ones like EVs and rockets. I simply don’t buy it. I think this attitude is mainly a defense mechanism.
Re:Twitter “no longer exists” as a company, merges into Musk...
by namaria on Wednesday April 12, 2023 @05:49AM
(#35537193)
It's a selection bias to think you have insight into enterprise success based on how your friends fared there...
Re:Twitter “no longer exists” as a company, merges into Musk...
by fortissimohn on Tuesday April 11, 2023 @07:13PM
(#35533004)
Occams Razor: he wants to be loved/heralded because he does not garner respect in real life. See his failed marriages, Thai cave feud, and the many times on Twitter he has silenced people who criticize him.
Tesla and electric cars was somehow even more reckless. EVs were a complete joke and nobody had started a successful car company in the US in decades. Unlike other billionaires, he doesn’t buy yachts or islands or seem interested in anything but work. This whole greed motive just doesn’t hold water.