https://www.rfa.org/english/news/vietnam/vietnams-human-righ...
Our morals in international politics are always just applied selectively, and there are few examples of where our best interest and moral considerations clash - because morality is immediately ignored or downplayed when interest is involved.
Also China doesn’t let you go where the real human rights abuses are in Xinjiang.
>Based on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, it was established by the US International Broadcasting Act of 1994 with the stated aim of "promoting democratic values and human rights", and countering the narrative of the Chinese Communist Party, as well as providing media reports about the North Korean government.[12] It is funded and supervised by the U.S. Agency for Global Media[13] (formerly Broadcasting Board of Governors), an independent agency of the United States government.
Also, it may be worth dropping by much of the Middle East to get another reality check on this question.
The only thing economic development seems to consistently result in is a higher demand for imports.
[1] Well, the nice parts of it are much wealthier than they used to be. The provincial towns are dying, and all the productive industries have been pushed out by oil and services.
Please don't preach on hackernews. Instead try and communicate what you know and why you know it.
The US will work with one-party countries as long as they're not a threat economically. How else do you think that Americans cheer when factories get moved to Vietnam, which is significantly worse in human rights?