How to be a -10x Engineer

Re:How to be a -10x Engineer by lelanthran on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @03:45PM (#35444952)

> Uugggghhh… “maintainable way” is again super subjective.

It's not "super subjective" when something super niche like Haskell[1] is chosen.

There are pragmatic reasons to choose a tech stack, the biggest of which is "can we find people to maintain it?". If you cannot, then it's unmaintainable.

[1] That's the example that was chosen upthread.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How to be a -10x Engineer by whateveracct on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @05:26PM (#35446055)

You know there are entire companies using Haskell in production successfully and have been for years, right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How to be a -10x Engineer by oblio on Tuesday April 04, 2023 @06:48PM (#35446890)

The number of companies using boring old Java, C#, C++ dwarfs your number by several orders of magnitude.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:How to be a -10x Engineer by whateveracct on Wednesday April 05, 2023 @01:32AM (#35449702)

So that's proof that you should never deviate? Hegemony always wins?

[ Parent | on HN ]