News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by GaggiX on Monday April 03, 2023 @09:39AM (#35423368)
>Building cutting-edge generative AI would require getting licenses from thousands—perhaps even millions—of copyright holders. The process would likely be so slow and expensive that only a handful of large companies could afford to do it. Even then, the resulting models likely wouldn’t be as good. And smaller companies might be locked out of the industry altogether.

Isn't this what Adobe has done? The results are actually really good.

Re:Stable Diffusion copyright lawsuits could be a legal eart... by whywhywhywhy on Monday April 03, 2023 @10:23AM (#35424074)
An open AI, no matter how it's trained is inherently more "ethical" than any AI Adobe trains.

I'd rather a million artists have their work "stolen", including my own if it ensures future generations wont be locked into Adobe like my work is.