Re:SpaceX moves Starship to launch site, and liftoff could b...
by lsh123 on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:52PM
(#35405897)
I already doubled it ;)
Re:SpaceX moves Starship to launch site, and liftoff could b...
by simonh on Saturday April 01, 2023 @09:37PM
(#35406191)
The starship upper stage has to come back down anyway, so I don’t see why you’d need to double the cost.
Re:SpaceX moves Starship to launch site, and liftoff could b...
by TOMDM on Sunday April 02, 2023 @09:32AM
(#35410321)
The upper stage coming down empty vs full of cargo are entirely different beasts surely?
Re:SpaceX moves Starship to launch site, and liftoff could b...
by dev_tty01 on Sunday April 02, 2023 @10:38AM
(#35410934)
Every kilogram of mass added to the return trip increases the required deceleration, fuel, etc. Not cheap. At some point you can't reach orbit with the required fuel to get everything back. The Falcon 9 boosters are nearly empty when they come back. As a matter of fact, at least one of their early landing failures was because they cut the fuel load too close and ran out of fuel just before reaching the ground. Minimizing weight on the return landing is critical.
I imagine the price of getting mass back down from orbit would bump your cost up a bit right?