Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by bayesian_horse on Saturday April 01, 2023 @12:25AM
(#35397132)
Bullshit. You are just reiterating the disfunctionality of the US political system. Elected officials acting against the interest, will and rights of their constituents.
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by rayiner on Saturday April 01, 2023 @08:25AM
(#35399696)
How are elected officials in red states acting against the “will” of constituents when e.g. Abbott was re-elected by a majority of women voters?
Re:Grand Jury Votes to Indict Donald Trump
by bayesian_horse on Saturday April 01, 2023 @01:18PM
(#35402042)
Polls quite consistently confirm a support for reproductive rights. You seem you know nothing about electoral politics in the US and how voter suppression, gerrymandering and other factors make such statements as yours entirely ridiculous. Same thing for gun control, actually.
Those "male legislative bodies" were almost invariably elected by female-majority electorates. And Republican women had a huge hand in getting those candidates elected, because they opposed Roe even more strongly than Republican men. https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/F2-Evaluatio.... "Republican women" were also "the only group to say overwhelmingly that life begins at conception. About three-quarters said so, compared with less than half of Republican men and a third of Democratic women." https://www.npr.org/2019/06/07/730183531/poll-majority-want-...
And while you're correct that most women, nationally, oppose the most extreme restrictions, most women also support restrictions that Roe didn't allow: https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/HHP.... For example, 75% of women and 69% of men said abortions should not be available after 15 weeks (see p. 41).
What you're seeing with extreme abortion restrictions in deep red states is actually the product of women's political power. Anti-abortion women are among the most reliable voting blocs. While Roe was in effect, Republicans ran hard-line candidates to get those voters to turn out. More moderate Republicans, folks who say supported bans after 6 weeks or 12 weeks, could get on the same side of opposing Roe. When Roe was overturned, you had these hard-line candidates in office, who were significantly to the right on the abortion issue of even most voters in those states.
Coalition politics can often result in elected officials who are more extreme on certain issues than the electorate as a whole. For example, elected Democrats in California overwhelmingly supported Prop 16. But Prop 16 was defeated 60-40 in the referendum: https://newsroom.ucla.edu/stories/prop-16-failed-in-californ....