News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @05:54AM (#35384694)
> Almost all of my kids' sports activities and parent groups are on WhatsApp, I have to use it.

My company asked me to install WhatsApp once, but I explained to them why I don't use it, and they didn't have a problem with it. Sometimes, all people need to know is 'no' and most of the time they don't even need an explanation.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:32AM (#35384943)
In large swathes of the world, refusing to use WhatsApp means losing contact with the majority of people you know. It's the de facto communications method in many countries.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:57AM (#35385132)
I live in a country where WhatsApp is used by almost everyone. I uninstalled it 2 years ago and told my contacts that they can find me on Telegram if they'd like to contact me. Most of my friends and family switched to Telegram, and I'm really grateful for that. I don't miss any updates, and I'm able to communicate on a platform I like. In the beginning, they found it odd, but eventually started to like it and some now even prefer it.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:59AM (#35385146)
My honest reply is that you don't know the conversations you were excluded from because of this decision.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pessimizer on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:26AM (#35385402)
This is just rationalizing FOMO. Of course you don't know the things you don't know.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by 411111111111111 on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:02AM (#35385749)
Except you actually are getting excluded in a lot of conversations after uninstalling, thus it's not just a fear...

So it's not FOMO, it's just plain MO.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:01AM (#35386484)
Yes, I continue to use WhatsApp because I have fear of missing out.

Missing out on conversations from my extended family, friends (only about 1/4 use Signal and all groups are on WhatsApp), work (the Health Service in Ireland literally runs on WhatsApp), voluntary undertakings (all of which are organised on WhatsApp), organising stuff for the kids (again all on WhatsApp).

So it's a valid fear based on the reality in my social circle and country. Unilaterally moving to Signal means self-imposed isolation.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by jen20 on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:22AM (#35386769)
> the Health Service in Ireland literally runs on WhatsApp

This part is terrifying: does Ireland not have the equivalent of HSR (UK, in combination with a patchwork of other legislation) or HIPAA?

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:32AM (#35387725)
Ireland is subject to the GDPR and various Data Protection Acts, but WhatsApp is an officially sanctioned communications medium. It's not used for patient communication or sending clinical data.

I think you might also be surprised by the level of WhatsApp use in the NHS. It's far more common in actual use than Pando or Teams.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by erehweb on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:07AM (#35387369)
Interested in a bit more context re Ireland Health Service - how does this work with older people / those in remote areas?
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:26AM (#35387641)
It's not generally used for patient communications or transmitting clinical data, but all organisation of shifts, clinical updates, etc is through WhatsApp. It's an official communication medium: https://healthservice.hse.ie/staff/procedures-guidelines/dig...

In 2021, when nearly the entire HSE IT system went down due to a cyberattack (including HSE email), literally the entire service ran on WhatsApp and taxis filled with paper records driving around.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by Supernaut on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:36PM (#35389570)
> the Health Service in Ireland literally runs on WhatsApp

What do you mean? I live in Ireland and no health professional has ever contacted me via WhatsApp.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @01:28PM (#35390251)
It's not public-facing. WhatsApp is the primary means of communication for HSE staff (and most of the public service).
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by Supernaut on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:10PM (#35390927)
Okay, fair enough. But presumably the WhatsApp groups are set up on an ad hoc basis by groups of staff - they're not being directed to use it by the HSE?
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by closewith on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:15PM (#35391011)
No, it's an official HSE communications channel. It was already prevalent before the cyberattack, but at that point, nearly all non-clinical comms moved to WhatsApp.

You just get added to the relevant groups by your manager (obviously there's also unofficial social groups) and that's where you'll get 90%+ of rosters, clinical updates, service bulletins, etc.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:12PM (#35390968)
Complain, that is not acceptable. Forcing people to be a member of a corporation is not on
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:11PM (#35390939)
How often would it have mattered if you missed out on those conversations, say as a percentage?
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by Karunamon on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:06AM (#35386555)
FOMO can be rational or irrational. In this case it is very much rational.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:02AM (#35385169)
And to be honest, I realize that, and I'm absolutely fine with it.

Maybe some won't be, but the path of idealism isn't always the most convenient.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by danielheath on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:16AM (#35385292)
Taking the consequences works fine if you're not responsible for anyone but yourself.

"Sorry kids, you aren't going to your friends parties or playing sports with them because my ideals conflict with your reality" is not a tenable position.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by mlatu on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:07AM (#35385807)
you forgot something... here, just add:

"your mileage may vary"

and bob's your aunty

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by ipaddr on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:32AM (#35387721)
Not to worry your kids friends will share that they have a party. If you forbid your daughter from dating a guy they will find there way around that somehow.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:38PM (#35389610)
> Taking the consequences works fine if you're not responsible for anyone but yourself.

Yeah, definitely. I'm just responsible for myself. The day I have to be responsible for others, I'll just immigrate to a country where everybody uses Telegram haha.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by rndmio on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:10AM (#35385837)
Tbh I'm kind of amused that you rail against WhatsApp and then went and installed Telegram rather than Signal.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:02PM (#35389101)
I have done my research well and I still support Telegram. I don't think Signal has what is needed to rival WhatsApp.

Telegram is a much better option that does not sell your user data and still has the best privacy options. Where most people like to disagree is the security part, but E2EE is not as important to me as long as my privacy is respected.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:16PM (#35391040)
Agreed, if I need to send encrypted data, I won't be using a messaging app to do it.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:15PM (#35391019)
Many reasons. Telegram is less evil then Whatsapp and it's best in class UI/UX. It's a compromise.

Signal is horrible to use and inconvenient for most people but with e2ee.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by adesanmi on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:13AM (#35385266)
This is a blessing, not a curse.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by mvuksano on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:16AM (#35385923)
And that's a good thing maybe.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by 1659447091 on Friday March 31, 2023 @11:44AM (#35388842)
I look at this as being more of a hidden blessing. The people I had been actual friends with, not just acquaintances, had no problems adding Signal. It was mostly for expat friends since in my part of the US we just SMS/iMessage, and we have group messages on Signal for the couple of mixed-location mutual friends. They still use WhatsApp for their other contacts but turns out this filtered for the people that cared enough if I were in their life or not.

Even after making the effort to keep up with the ones that only wanted to use WhatsApps, through email or regular text message, they couldn't be bothered. I guess I have moved into the point in my life where I prefer the quality of friends who wanted me around for more than being an extra body to fill out their party guest list (and similar).

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by bsenftner on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:58AM (#35385140)
This is so wrong, it demonstrates how our human society is fundamentally broken, if not operated and manipulated.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by tinus_hn on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:17AM (#35386691)
A tale about choices and consequences.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by belter on Friday March 31, 2023 @11:24AM (#35388507)
And I confess to have done that, to achieve exactly those expected consequences... :-)
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:09PM (#35390894)
Lucky here, Whatsapp isn't the goto
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by luluganeta on Friday March 31, 2023 @06:46AM (#35385045)
that's a nice company, but parent comment had a really important point about depending on Whatsapp for basic social interaction.

most informal social groups, parents included, now communicate mainly on whatsapp. You can naturally say no (i did) but then your kid is left out of most social events unless you're actively syncing with other parents every week to be in the loop (which is what i do and it's excruciating).

Whatsapp as a platform is extremely convenient, which is why other people will have a hard time understanding your reluctance to adhere, it's not uncommon to be seen as eccentric.

so again, congratulations on finding a great company, but there are real issues with the general social dependence on a single invasive platform.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:01AM (#35385163)
Yeah, I totally understand your point. I had to be the stubborn one to leave WhatsApp and refuse any communication unless they contact me on Telegram.

Some didn't like it at first, but thankfully most of them now love Telegram. I have a “My way or the highway” kinda attitude when it comes to WhatsApp, it has certainly caused problems once or twice, but I'm very firm on my stance against Facebook apps.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by duud on Friday March 31, 2023 @07:42AM (#35385552)
How is Telegram more privacy preserving than WhatsApp?
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by tcfhgj on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:29AM (#35386072)
It isn't. It creates massive barriers for using e2ee
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:05PM (#35389171)
I get where you're coming from but Telegram is objectively better than WhatsApp due to several reasons:

- Privacy controls for each user.

- No hard requirement for a phone number.

- Cloud encryption.

- Open Source clients.

- Telegram's track record.

- Business model not revolving around selling user data.

WhatsApp is a black box and nobody has any good arguments for it other than 'supposed' E2EE that nobody knows anything about. The fact that WhatsApp's T&C forbid you from even reverse engineering the obfuscated binaries and Facebook being the force behind WhatsApp, I'm still surprised that people take their E2EE claim seriously.

It's like me promising you that I'm not looking at you, while I stand facing you, right behind you.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by tcfhgj on Saturday April 01, 2023 @09:36AM (#35400208)
> - No hard requirement for a phone number

Only if you pay

> - Open Source clients.

Matrix/WhatsApp

> - Telegram's track record

Which is?

> WhatsApp is a black box and nobody has any good arguments for it other than 'supposed' E2EE that nobody knows anything about.

With Telegram you have a guarantee that it is not E2EE in group chats and single chats if you don't opt into a way worse UX/features.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Saturday April 01, 2023 @10:49PM (#35406660)
> Mautrix/WhatsApp

I'm sorry, but that's not a good example. It doesn't even count as a legitimate client.

> Which is?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Telegram_in_Russia

https://hongkongfp.com/2020/07/05/exclusive-telegram-to-temp...

https://www.vice.com/en/article/a3yavb/russia-blocks-telegra...

https://sensortower.com/blog/hong-kong-protests-app-download...

> With Telegram you have a guarantee that it is not E2EE in group chats and single chats if you don't opt into a way worse UX/features.

You're saying this as if you have a guarantee that WhatsApp's E2EE is 100% correct. At least with Telegram, I know what data the app is collecting, where it's going and how it's being stored on the device.

> True for Whatsapp as well, it's funded by business accounts and perhaps other parts of facebook

Assumption again.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by tcfhgj on Sunday April 02, 2023 @07:25AM (#35409410)
> I'm sorry, but that's not a good example. It doesn't even count as a legitimate client.

why not? After all the client uses the multi-device API like the official client does

> You're saying this as if you have a guarantee that WhatsApp's E2EE is 100% correct.

I am not saying it like that. I am explicitly saying that with Telegram you have the guarantee that it is not E2EE, while there at least exist the possibility of WhatsApp being E2EE.

> Assumption again.

An observation, not assumption. WhatsApp wants to see money for business accounts: https://business.whatsapp.com/products/platform-pricing

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by jen20 on Friday March 31, 2023 @09:23AM (#35386786)
I do wonder about that: moving from WhatsApp to Telegram appears to be a case of moving from the frying pan into the fire. To Signal seems somewhere more reasonable.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:07PM (#35389209)
I don't think Signal has what it takes to combat Facebook's monopoly. It's more inconvenient than WhatsApp, why would people even switch?

Telegram on the other hand does not compromise on features and user experience and still is able to deliver a system that doesn't disrespect the user data.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by jen20 on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:24PM (#35391165)
I perhaps don't know what I'm missing with WhatsApp, but I use Signal with Android-owning friends (iMessage for everyone else), and no-one has voiced displeasure - indeed it was _suggested_ by many of them, both technical and non-technical as preferable to SMS, so I don't think it can be that bad.

I don't have special insight into either WhatsApp or Telegram, but I think given the founders and jurisdictions in which they operate, Telegram deserves at least the same level of scepticism and scrutiny as TikTok.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:50PM (#35391564)
You'll find this interesting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_Telegram_in_Russia

I don't think Telegram deserves scrutiny. Not after what they've been able to accomplish and follow.

> indeed it was _suggested_ by many of them, both technical and non-technical as preferable to SMS, so I don't think it can be that bad.

It's not bad of course, but it's extremely hard to get WhatsApp users to switch to Signal than Telegram. Both because of missing WhatsApp features in Signal and the additional hoops like PIN.

I'm Just speaking from personal experience. Signal was also my first choice.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by jen20 on Friday March 31, 2023 @11:49PM (#35396918)
> I don't think Telegram deserves scrutiny.

Every communication channel deserves scrutiny according to the threat model of a given user.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:07PM (#35390854)
I would say from the frying pan into the kitchen bench. It's not perfect but it's not yet being cooked.

Telegram is a good compromise. Yeah it's not e2ee.

Signal isn't even a good compromise for most people. I don't know anyone who has stuck with signal in my circles. They've nearly all reverted back their previous service or find a new one.

Personally I treat everything that is sent over networks as public data. So I would never comm anything that needed e2ee via a message service full stop.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by jen20 on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:24PM (#35391179)
> Telegram is a good compromise. Yeah it's not e2ee.

That does not sound like a good compromise to me.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by pleb_nz on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:59PM (#35391693)
To you maybe, to lots of people it is.

I wouldn't use a messaging app to send encrypted content in the first place. But I do want trusted privacy control which telegram provides

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by geraldhh on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:47AM (#35387942)
it's not embedded within the us data industrial complex (meta, alphabet)
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by mhoad on Friday March 31, 2023 @05:05PM (#35393644)
It’s a British Virgin Islands registered company run by a Russian billionaire who lives in Dubai.
Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by NayamAmarshe on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:12PM (#35389268)
Because it is, if you read about it.

Their track record is excellent. Pavel moved away from Russia (and his team of 20 something members too!) only because the Russian government pressured them into giving access to their servers.

WhatsApp is anything but privacy preserving. You have 0 transparency. You can't even prove if the E2EE exists for 100% of the time or just 50% of the time because the binaries are obfuscated. On top of that, their privacy policy and being owned by Facebook says everything one needs to know.

Telegram, IMHO, is the only app that does not compromise on user experience and still provides fantastic privacy control and respects the user data. Sure, it's not E2EE, but no E2EE app can ever do what Telegram is doing at this scale.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by ghaff on Friday March 31, 2023 @10:52AM (#35388021)
It depends where you live.

In the US, I don't have Telegram and it's been ages since I sent a message on WhatsApp. Everyone I know just uses SMS.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by bilekas on Friday March 31, 2023 @08:07AM (#35385813)
Ignoring the red flag the company would require whatsapp, I can easily see a company not forcing you to use it and being okay.

But as op mentioned

> kids' sports activities and parent groups

Try telling your kids football team coach that you object to Whatsapp and your kids friends' parents that you will not join Facebook for privacy reasons, it's a much harder ask, they might say fine, but you can't expect other people to change their behavior based on your beliefs. No matter how right you are.

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by malka on Friday March 31, 2023 @12:01PM (#35389098)
Then, lie.

"I can't because my Facebook got hacked, and I got banned from Facebook. I tried multiple time to recreate an account but it was banned each time :('

Re:Meta wants EU users to apply for permission to opt out of... by mbesto on Friday March 31, 2023 @02:20PM (#35391109)
> My company asked me to install WhatsApp once, but I explained to them why I don't use it, and they didn't have a problem with it.

IANAL but if this is on your personal device they can't compel you to do so. Otherwise they need to provide a company issued device.