Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by nradov on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:26AM
(#35372348)
Nuclear launch systems are physically separated (air gap). How exactly would a computer gain access?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by rtontic on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:36AM
(#35372474)
Hm, maybe a Boston dynamics robot could drop a USB in front of NORAD?
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by CatWChainsaw on Saturday April 08, 2023 @11:59AM
(#35494546)
No need, just hijack their Uber Eats order. Apparently delivery people can walk right in and find soldiers napping on the job.
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by chasd00 on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:45AM
(#35372617)
The risk is relying on AI to give a human information on whether or not to push the button and the AI gets it wrong but communicates so effectively the human trusts it without question.
An AI learning about and then executing a social engineering attack on a human (whether with malicious intent or not) seems like a reasonable thign to be worried about to me.
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by nradov on Thursday March 30, 2023 @10:17AM
(#35373059)
Initiating a nuclear strike requires sending authentication codes via designated secure channels. No matter how good some hypothetical future AI gets at impersonating President Biden, it won't be able to ring up the duty officer at Minot Air Force Base and order them to nuke Moscow. Don't believe what you see in the movies.
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by felipemnoa on Thursday March 30, 2023 @11:00AM
(#35373662)
I don't know, I'm pretty sure some future AI is up for the challenge. I can almost picture an AI telling another AI, hold my beer...
Re:Pause Giant AI Experiments: An Open Letter
by ImPostingOnHN on Thursday March 30, 2023 @05:04PM
(#35378803)
imagine instead just making it look like someone is attacking you
such incidents stemming from human error have already gotten us close to responding with force