News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by dragonwriter on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @10:19PM (#35366985)
The one question you present evidence of is not questioning the legitimacy and validity of the election; there is a difference between believing (rightly or wrongly, with or without sufficient cause) that improper activity effected the popular vote tally and believing that the election is illegitimate.

You present no evidence relating to actual election denial.

Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by throwawaylinux on Wednesday March 29, 2023 @11:37PM (#35367605)
> The one question you present evidence of is not questioning the legitimacy and validity of the election;

False.

> there is a difference between believing (rightly or wrongly, with or without sufficient cause) that improper activity effected the popular vote tally and believing that the election is illegitimate.

There are differences between different things. Believing election tallies were hacked certainly is a baseless conspiracy theory that questions the legitimacy of the election, despite your wailing and gnashing of teeth. Not to mention something like a full 1/4 of Democrat voters believed Trump to be an illegitimate president too.

Your gaslighting and sealioning doesn't work I'm afraid, better luck with somebody else.

Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by dang on Thursday March 30, 2023 @01:01AM (#35368225)
You've broken the site guidelines egregiously here, and have unfortunately been doing that a bunch elsewhere. We've warned you multiple times before:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34429933 (Jan 2023)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30858404 (March 2022)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29085513 (Nov 2021)

If you keep this up we're going to have to ban you. I don't want to ban you. Therefore could you please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules? Including, but not limited to: not being snarky, not calling names, not making personal attacks, not posting flamewar comments, and not using HN primarily for political battle.

Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by throwawaylinux on Thursday March 30, 2023 @03:14AM (#35369176)
Sure I'll try to do better, I'm sorry. Would you apply the same rules to people escalating, calling me names, being snarky, etc in the same thread?
Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by dang on Thursday March 30, 2023 @09:39PM (#35381306)
Appreciated!

Yes, if that's what they were doing, but I'd have to see specific links. (For example I don't think https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35366985 broke the site guidelines although it wasn't entirely un-edgy either.)

Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by throwawaylinux on Thursday March 30, 2023 @10:51PM (#35381877)
I don't have a problem with the comment you linked. But this https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35366133 kicked off the snark with the first sentence, and quickly escalated to namecalling, calling me a liar a few comments later.

So yes I should have just ignored them or kept the higher ground, but sometimes that kind of trolling sucks me in.

Re:Senate Bill to Ban TikTok by dang on Friday March 31, 2023 @01:21AM (#35382939)
I don't think the first sentence of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35366133 was snarky. Interpretations differ, of course, and often by quite a bit when someone is speaking to you personally, but FWIW that sounds rather neutral to my ear.