Re:Apple Music Classical
by throwanem on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @06:29AM
(#35338450)
I'd remind you J. S. Bach exists, and ask if you want to think this one over.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple Music Classical
by wildrhythms on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @06:54AM
(#35338675)
What does this mean?
Bach's oeuvre is practically inexhaustible and after a while gets to feel a bit samey in places. This led me to make a joke that, judging by a sibling comment of yours, has not landed well among Bach fans, who seem to have a history [1] of being annoyed by such badinage.
Apparently there's something about his work that's seen [2] as uniquely susceptible to automation, and I suppose I can see where the irritation would come from. Doesn't bother me any, but then I've always preferred Beethoven anyway.
[1] https://slate.com/technology/2019/03/google-doodle-bach-ai-m...
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/1997/11/11/science/undiscovered-bach...
Re:Apple Music Classical
by BurningFrog on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @07:21AM
(#35338889)
J. S. Bach ceased existing in 1750.
Re:Apple Music Classical
by easyThrowaway on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @09:10AM
(#35340437)
The idea that Bach composed the Well tempered clavier and similar works merely in a mechanical process is basically a fairy tale, and it's kind obvious once you read the music sheets.
I might've been clearer I was making a joke, I suppose.
Re:Apple Music Classical
by easyThrowaway on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @10:04AM
(#35341291)
Oh. Sorry, I've heard that so many times with no hints of irony that it flew quite over my head.
No harm done. Chalk it up to appreciating the music in near perfect ignorance of its contemporary social context - I had no idea that'd been a controversial point until I went looking for why something I'd thought a harmless joke had crossed people.