throwanem
throwanem on Hacker News
True, but it's rude to call that out, not to mention rather more arrogant than wise. These are trepidatory times, and like many, his job is not at all secure. In his shoes I'd be frightened too, and he displays reasonable grace in spite of it; I have done less well at times.
You are desperately misguided.
I would say how, but I am not your friend and here in the 2030s, no one can afford to give anything valuable for free to a stranger. Be glad of the advice, of which you'd be wise to make much more than you will.
You want to try to change things? Great. So write the book!
My comment on the other thread meanwhile wasn't nice at all, but it was also misdirected, and meant to refer to Hacker News rather than your own site.
(I like the style, too. It's good to see Helvetica get a deserved reevaluation, now that the millennial generation is aging out of even being able to imagine we are cool. Or ever were.)
My own profile on this website may help elucidate my perspective on the matter. I'm both shadowbanned and have applied a hundred-year "noprocrast" countdown, and it's frankly embarrassing how little that actually does to get the website not to accept those few contributions I still care to make.
It is as if the folks who run this place were getting a little desperate! - both for the "crowdsourced" unpaid work that goes into making this website worthy of interest, and for the last dwindling taste of what was once termed the "hacker spirit" by fringey weirdo ideologues like Stallman and Barlow.
(The idea that HTTP GET requests must be idempotent for safety, for example, has totally passed by this site's implementors and maintainers, or maybe never made a dent. Hence the subject of this very thread!)
In any case I regret the misplaced comment, and apologize for the dismay it likely caused. This website is embarrassing, and has just about run its course. Yours is not embarrassing at all, and I hope you're just getting started!
Not at all related, but I love your work! Your photographs betray a subtle, curious, particular, and respectful eye. Keep shooting!
You needn't; I just did.
Mr. Gackle isn't really all that frightening, you know. There's no need to fear talking with him.
"What an embarrassing website! It has just about run its course, hasn't it?"
> Also, when did we stop liking to learn?
When it got dangerous to spend that kind of time without a bullet-point deliverable.
Why assume people would not buy and sell Hacker News accounts?
The real HN discussion guidelines.
Much better than you, hon.
Lol ok loser. Enjoy your $5000 a month roach pit
Until now Apple hasn't addressed the mass market in nearly two decades. That's one human generation, and it is also the span of time between when something first hits and when it sees its first retro revival. That isn't a coincidence.
I'm starting to get a little excited! This is going to be quite a decade.
Because Brooklyn is finished.
To say the least. Great catch! 'O brave new world, that has such people in 't.'
> Doesn't have to be. You can train it on normal pictures of children and nude images of adults.
You say this so casually, as though it were a normal thing to know, or as if a normal person would know it. Does that actually seem true where you live right now?
And how do you know that, anyway, Harsh? I mean, all those "unblocked" games you stole to give away and that you also put on Github, that's one thing. But this...
Oh, he knows what he said. That's why he made a sockpuppet account to say it.
"HR" does not set your professional obligations. If you need to be drunk to talk this honestly, you are not a "senior" nor a mentor but a coward.
Then again, this person is obviously also lying to claim the engineer title - sit down, "data science!" - so that really sets an ironically honest baseline on how seriously anyone should be taking any of this farrago and doggerel.
> You should not switch medications based on the uninformed ramblings of non-trustworthy pseudonymous internet people.
I hear a whole lot of "what I can't" and next to none of "what I can." Not where I'd want to be, but it's no skin off my nose, either. Good luck holding on to your soul - good luck, and I hope you end up not needing it.
Moral odium inheres, if nowhere else, in that you insist upon the seductive counsel of despair. The more convincing you make that, the less our fellows will feel themselves able in any meaningful way to act at all. What should I call such encouragement to cowardice, if not culpable?
In your self-exculpation.
I really don't have to respect that.
If we're to talk about what you're ashamed of, why bring up the least blameworthy examples you can find? Do you want to be shriven, or enabled?
Wonderful! Thank you for taking the time to think, with intention, about why.
You don't sound too confident.
You built Freenet? What about that experience encouraged you to continue building things?
You will live to regret your moral cowardice. Specifically, you'll regret the wrong choices it leads you to make. The guilt you feel now is a warning. Don't stay lazy, or that guilt will eventually be augmented by shame.
You are responsible for the reasonably foreseeable consequences of your own actions.
I'm not going to point to a TV show about alcoholism to substantiate that. You don't need me to. It is also why manslaughter, though a lesser crime than murder, remains a crime.