Re:The Ancient Indian Buddhist Monk Buried in Athens
by 8bitsrule on Monday March 27, 2023 @09:44PM
(#35334765)
Agree, reasonable this might be closer to the real story. 1)Answers: what happened to the 12 years; 2) Why the stories were written decades later; 3) the co-opt seems likely at the 325 Council of Nicea.
Re:The Ancient Indian Buddhist Monk Buried in Athens
by lazide on Monday March 27, 2023 @11:33PM
(#35335553)
As far as 2) scribes were expensive then, and paper/skins even more so. The stories weren’t written down until it was clear they were ‘hot’ and worth it.
Same with Buddhism, near as anyone can tell. None of the scripture is contemporary with Buddha.
Re:The Ancient Indian Buddhist Monk Buried in Athens
by berkes on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @03:51AM
(#35337229)
I can even imagine one story being about "my teacher once met this dude who said we should be nice to each-other" and "a cousin heard about this guy who said that poor people should be helped by neighbors" and those somehow merged and became one person one story.
It happens today, in an era where information is/appears much more precise, people and attribution is common. e.g. quotes being attributed to Einstein or some rock-star, or actors "cancelled" for stuff some other person did or said.
Re:The Ancient Indian Buddhist Monk Buried in Athens
by Ekaros on Tuesday March 28, 2023 @04:09AM
(#35337329)
I kinda always wonder about Romans doing the killing. Was it because there was something going on. Or was it the easy route out asked by local dignitaries. Hey please get rid of this guy for us. And they just obliged to do the deed. Whole washing hands of the thing points me to that direction.
Re:The Ancient Indian Buddhist Monk Buried in Athens
by colechristensen on Saturday April 01, 2023 @09:11PM
(#35406032)
Likely both. Rome had some control over the religious leadership as well. So this somewhat at least revolutionary annoyed ordinary Jews, the local Roman influenced religious leadership, and the local Roman authorities by being perceived as a kind of revolutionary at minimum in a religious sense but also in a actual sense regardless of the truth of these things.
The annoyed religious leadership referred him to the local Roman in charge of such things who had him executed.
All conjecture but reasonable enough.
If you start with the premise that Jesus was a real person but not divine, I think the real story would look a lot like that.