Re:Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access
by vxNsr on Sunday March 26, 2023 @02:00PM
(#35317425)
Just curious is the any different from what happens right now, when someone campaigns against something you disagree with? If someone online, pseudo-anonymously posts something that is perceived to be against trans rights or pro-life, there is already a mob of people working to de-anonymize and punish them for their wrong-think. How is it any different or better to have the current system?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access
by pavel_lishin on Sunday March 26, 2023 @05:38PM
(#35319909)
> Just curious is the any different from what happens right now
Because right now you can be anonymous/pseudonymous? Of course people will try to unmask you, but I'm contrasting it in a world where you can't even attempt it.
Re:Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access
by vxNsr on Sunday March 26, 2023 @06:46PM
(#35320500)
But what’s the benefit if any time you actually espouse an unpopular opinion you will be unmasked.
Re:Utah is first US state to limit teen social media access
by pavel_lishin on Sunday March 26, 2023 @08:29PM
(#35321351)
There's a difference between _guaranteed_ unmasking, and not.
Thank you for your time.