News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:02PM (#35309444)
Literally everyone who lifts weight and trains properly for a decent length of time knows that bulking (eating more calories to put on weight) and cutting (eating fewer calories to reduce weight) work.

The fact that this is even at all debated is bizarre. These people should stick to astrology.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:05PM (#35309472)
I've gained 20lbs over 3 months of Starting Strength. I wish it was all muscle but it wasn't.
Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:08PM (#35309497)
Of course it's not, that's not how the body works.

You ate in a surplus and gained some muscle and some fat.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:09PM (#35309508)
Just saying that what "everyone knows" isn't always true.
Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:15PM (#35309567)
Are you disappointed with the results of your eating and training, are you claiming that you gained weight despite reducing calorie intake, or is there some third option I'm missing?

I also gain weight when I eat more and train, what's the confusing bit here?

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:26PM (#35309648)
The first. People said "eat less" and it didn't work. People said "train more" and it didn't work. Then people said "Duh, you gotta do both at the same time!" which is obviously not sustainably possible.
Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:33PM (#35309701)
Based on your other posts, you're saying "it didn't work" when you actually mean "I didn't do it".

It's not sustainable to maintain a calorie deficit indefinitely. No-one claims that. That would be anorexia.

What is sustainable is to eat in a calorie deficit for a period of time until you reach a weight you're happy with and then maintain.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:41PM (#35309758)
The problem for me was I was 300lbs. That's a really long time to run a deficit until I reach a weight I'm happy with. Took me nearly 2 years last time.

I think what you're describing is probably accurate for reasonably lean people trying to cut 10lbs. But for the severely obese (I briefly hit morbidly, in my case) that strategy doesn't help very much. Getting from 300 to 290lbs isn't nothing, but it's not enough.

I believe that you only get to severe obesity by something being seriously wrong with your metabolism. Therefore you need to identify that issue and fix it, probably with some pretty severe intervention, to get back to healthy.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Saturday March 25, 2023 @09:44PM (#35309776)
So it took you two years to get to a weight that you were happy with by eating in a deficit. I assume you don't mean that it took two years to drop 10lbs. It sounds as if you identified the problem and fixed it! You lost the weight! What happened next?

Having done that for two years, why was it unsustainable to eat at maintenance from then on? You felt hungry? Lost interest? I lose interest in goals all of the time. But what happened?

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Saturday March 25, 2023 @10:01PM (#35309901)
Yea I dropped about 100lbs. Not exactly sure cause I never weighed myself at my heaviest. I was living abroad at the time and started keto and from then on the weight just melted off.

I wasn't even doing anything - just eating keto to satiety every day. Then I moved back to the US and slowly began gaining it all back (also over about 2 years).

I tried various things to slow down or reverse the gain, including lifting, other methods of working out, dieting more or harder.. nothing worked. Until this :) With the heavy cream. Down 45lbs again so far. Yay!

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by 5636553454654 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @07:22AM (#35313252)
> I've gained 20lbs over 3 months of Starting Strength. I wish it was all muscle but it wasn't.

You gained fat following a program that is notorious for making people fat. Google images for "starting strength meme" and see for yourself.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Sunday March 26, 2023 @11:58AM (#35315890)
Interesting. It was recommended to me for losing weight lol. Are there other lifting protocols more designed for fat loss?

I know Rippetoe's answer to everything is "eat moar fooood!" so yea I kinda see how that meme exists.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @02:28PM (#35317737)
Fork putdowns and plate pushaways.

More seriously, there are lifting programs designed to be run whilst in a deficit - they typically lower volume. Their purpose is to maintain muscle mass so that the body preferentially catabolizes fat.

They don't actually produce fat loss in and of themselves, that's primarily diet.

It sounds like what you need is psychological. You need a way to convince yourself to stick with it. No program can do that, it's just a list of instructions.

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by 5636553454654 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @06:38PM (#35320433)
> It was recommended to me for losing weight lol.

Are you serious? SS is notorious for making people fat, or even obese. Rippetoe has repeatedly said he doesn't care about your abs, and tells you not to run. Go look at the people in this video: youtube.com/watch?v=REtVJO4FC0s

Most of them are overweight or obese. This guy recently went viral as a another SS "success": https://old.reddit.com/r/StartingStrength/comments/y0ybtd/ad...

> Are there other lifting protocols more designed for fat loss?

Cardio is better for fatloss, tbh, and lifting in a deficit is best pursued as a way to preserve muscle mass and maximize the weight lost from fat. If you're a newb you can recomp somewhat, but it becomes harder the longer you train and leaner you get. SS is too low volume of a porgram to aid much in fat loss, and a higher volume (more reps per set, more sets) hypertrophy program would burn more calories, but you really should try to incorporate regular cardio, especially that you enjoy and can maintain.

Your diet should be high protein (at least 1g per lb. of bw, but with the obese, height in cm. is used instead, so target 1g per cm. of height), again, to shift the balance towards fat vs. muscle loss, and high in carbohydrate (fruit, veg, whole grain) to fuel workouts, replenish glycogen, and spare muscle protein, and low in fat (especially saturated fat).

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by exfatloss on Sunday March 26, 2023 @08:15PM (#35321234)
I had no idea about Starting Strength being famous for that. I did notice that Rippetoe is very nonchalant about obesity lol, like it doesn't matter as long as you can lift stuff.

Thanks!

Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by 1shox on Saturday March 25, 2023 @11:45PM (#35310648)
facts. I thought of astrology too when I saw OP's post history lol.
Re:The Efficient Frontier of Fat Loss by throwaway22032 on Sunday March 26, 2023 @01:13AM (#35311222)
https://exfatloss.substack.com/p/ex150-diet-macros-2294kcal-...

I'm pretty sure, having seen that, that this is just a really elaborate troll. I stopped engaging after seeing this.

His chosen method of achieving caloric restriction is to get 70% of his nutrition from cream. The amount of cream isn't even defined; it's just "I have some amount of coffee a day and this one time I measured how much cream was in it". If for whatever reason one day Starbucks changes their coffee and he ends up having 8 instead of 5 the whole thing will change arbitrarily.

If this is real then the guy needs psychological help.