Re:America’s banks are missing hundreds of billions of dollars
by 7e on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @12:58AM
(#35257005)
If capital is too risky to raise, why can’t a bank refuse deposits?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:America’s banks are missing hundreds of billions of dollars
by lmm on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @02:39AM
(#35257580)
That would at the very least be unpopular with their customers, if not outright illegal. What would it look like to be a customer at a bank that did that? Especially for something like SVB - your startup closes its funding round, they wire the money to your bank account, and the bank refuses it?
Re:America’s banks are missing hundreds of billions of dollars
by wahern on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @03:08AM
(#35257774)
SVB lobbied for a law that changed a crucial regulatory threshold from $50 billion to $250 billion. From ~2016 to ~2020 their assets jumped from <$50 billion to >$200 billion, with most of that happening from 2020 to 2022.
SVB was perfectly capable of restricting the total amount of assets it held. It wasn't a matter of rejecting small deposits; it was a matter of allowing (or rather, soliciting) huge clients to open new accounts to hold hundreds of millions or billions in assets.
Re:America’s banks are missing hundreds of billions of dollars
by withinboredom on Wednesday March 22, 2023 @02:48AM
(#35257642)
“What do you mean my paycheck isn’t in my account?”
I don’t see that working too well …