News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gitea 1.19 by dboreham on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:02PM (#35233584)
Quick note that the forked project doesn't have the CI feature released in 1.9, which is the primary subject of this thread.
Re:Gitea 1.19 by dave78 on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:26PM (#35234009)
I assume they will follow up with their own 1.19 release soon. The blog below indicates they will have the CI feature.

https://forgejo.org/2023-02-27-forgejo-actions/

Re:Gitea 1.19 by joencott on Monday March 20, 2023 @12:50PM (#35234501)
It is sad to see that the forgejo team accept and promote the built-in CI server. When the PR was first made they said they shouldn't trust the code, and will stick with woodpecker.
Re:Gitea 1.19 by remram on Monday March 20, 2023 @01:19PM (#35235022)
It seems that they have "soft forked" act as well. I worry that they will spend more time maintaining all their forks than doing any original development...
Re:Gitea 1.19 by dave78 on Monday March 20, 2023 @01:27PM (#35235211)
Gitea soft forked act as well, from https://gitea.com/gitea/act:

"This is a custom fork of nektos/act, for the purpose of serving act_runner.

It cannot be used as command line tool anymore, but only as a library.

It's a soft fork, which means that it will tracking the latest release of nektos/act."

Re:Gitea 1.19 by remram on Monday March 20, 2023 @01:37PM (#35235390)
I see, removed that from my comment then. Now I worry even more about everyone maintaining forks of everything rather than doing original development.

I wonder what differences there are between Gitea's and Forgejo's forks, and also why they couldn't work with upstream.