Understanding CD-R and CD-RW (2003) [pdf]

Re:Understanding CD-R and CD-RW (2003) [pdf] by SillyUsername on Sunday March 19, 2023 @04:01PM (#35222941)

I'm not going to do you a personalised study. Why don't you check it for yourself instead of down voting, or perhaps actually prove me wrong - my comments clearly stated this is anecdotal and "effectively"?

If you take a small pool individuals who discuss technical topics, and dilute it with more people it will trend down owing to the population IQ approaching the average of ~100.

Technical articles will also be less prevalent owing to the relative greater number of non technical topics and less interest in those that are.

It's not that technical people don't enjoy memes, it's that the wider populous won't enjoy esoteric technical or scientific articles.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Understanding CD-R and CD-RW (2003) [pdf] by USA-RedDragon on Sunday March 19, 2023 @06:16PM (#35224266)

Wow you really are an idiot. I was making fun of your for saying IQ quotient. That's literally "Intelligence quotient quotient". You make about as much sense as GPT 3.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Understanding CD-R and CD-RW (2003) [pdf] by dang on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @11:50PM (#35256598)

We've banned this account. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Edit: I changed my mind and unbanned you because https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29870459 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34047843 were really good HN comments. Please post like that, and not like the parent, in the future!

[ Parent | on HN ]