Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by tedunangst on Saturday March 18, 2023 @01:23AM
(#35206362)
My experience opting out of body scanners, contrary to internet tales, is that it's rarely longer than the normal line, and sometimes even faster.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by defnotarobot on Saturday March 18, 2023 @01:24AM
(#35206374)
True story, though a fair amount intimate.
Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by Espressosaurus on Saturday March 18, 2023 @02:14AM
(#35206609)
I've found it's rarely faster, but usually not too much slower. You do get to let your shit hang out for awhile on the other side though, and I never like leaving expensive laptops and cellphones and wallets just lying there indefinitely.
Also greater chance you get a false positive on the swab and that will blow your schedule as the tear apart all your luggage looking for a bomb or gun that doesn't exist. That easily chews half an hour if you're lucky.
Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by sacnoradhq on Saturday March 18, 2023 @03:41PM
(#35212397)
Modern body scanners show a "heat map" of areas of interest rather than denude people like the early ones did. I'm wondering if raw imagery is captured and stored.
Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by Fatnino on Sunday March 19, 2023 @01:45AM
(#35216375)
It's always a very safe bet to assume that any data that has passed through a computer somewhere has been captured and stored.
Re:TSA confirms plans to mandate mug shots for domestic air ...
by marssaxman on Tuesday March 21, 2023 @01:14PM
(#35249266)
What do you mean by "the normal line", and how is it possible for the patdown process to be faster? I have never gone through a TSA body scanner, but I go through the same security line as everyone else, and there's always a short wait for the TSA to call someone up for the "assist". I wonder what you're doing differently.