Re:Former Meta staffer reveals she had to ‘fight for work’
by spywaregorilla on Thursday March 16, 2023 @06:17PM
(#35189600)
I hear this a lot but I think it's bullshit. Neither of those are goals that anyone would realistically pursue. It was almost certainly middle managers wanting to demonstrate impact by leading a larger team.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Former Meta staffer reveals she had to ‘fight for work’
by twelve40 on Thursday March 16, 2023 @06:30PM
(#35189781)
how could middle managers double the headcount by themselves? nobody above them noticed that?
Re:Former Meta staffer reveals she had to ‘fight for work’
by christophilus on Thursday March 16, 2023 @06:36PM
(#35189859)
Probably exactly this. Each tier of management hired a fair bit more than they should have. Managers are generally incentivized to do so. The behavior was normalized and no one really noticed while money was cheap and all seemed well with the world.
Re:Former Meta staffer reveals she had to ‘fight for work’
by fmajid on Thursday March 16, 2023 @08:57PM
(#35191283)
No. There was a data science conference in the Western US a decade ago. Mark Zuckerberg showed up unannounced, with a job offer for every single attendee.
The strategy comes straight from the top, and it makes perfect sense. Even if they are not fully utilized, even a FAANG salary is small potatoes compared to what top-tier talent can bring to a company. Think of it as the HR version of what VC do, invest in many people knowing 90% will fail to live up to their potential, because the 10% that do more than make up for it.