We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training data

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by p1necone on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @10:51PM (#35163148)

It is called copyright infringement. If I write a book, and there's more than a few sentences in a row of content that's verbatim/almost verbatim the same as someone elses published writing (excluding intentional quotes/references) I do get in trouble.

You can't just go "computer did it" and handwave away existing IP law.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by stale2002 on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @11:30PM (#35163472)

> there's more than a few sentences in a row of content that's verbatim/almost verbatim

Ok, now image that it isn't giving out verbatim results. Which is a lot of content.

Totally fine then right?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We can't all use AI. Someone has to generate the training... by anonzzzies on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @12:20AM (#35163815)

> I do get in trouble.

Unless the original was a bestseller and you are a bestseller, you almost certainly will not. This obviously happens all the time as most writers suck and do actually deliberately copy things and then self publish. AI is actually helping to now not do that.

[ Parent | on HN ]