News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPT-4 by chillfox on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @07:31PM (#35161071)
Another way of looking at that is that gpt not being open source so companies can run it on their own clusters is holding it back.
Re:GPT-4 by nine_k on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:24PM (#35161797)
Back in the day Google offered hardware search appliances.

Offering sealed server boxes with GPT software, to run on premises heavily firewalled or air-gapped could be a viable business model.

Re:GPT-4 by euroderf on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @05:55AM (#35165886)
[ A prompt that gets it to decompile itself. With good inline documentation too! ]
Re:GPT-4 by nine_k on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @10:24AM (#35168757)
I'm afraid that even the most obedient human can't readily dump the contents of their connectome in a readable format. Same likely applies to LLMs: they study human-generated texts, not their own source code, let alone their tensors' weights.
Re:GPT-4 by euroderf on Wednesday March 15, 2023 @04:24PM (#35174230)
Well, what they study is decided by the relevant hoominz. There's nothing actually stopping LLMs from trying to understand their own innards, is there ? Except for the actual access.