Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by em500 on Monday March 13, 2023 @05:11AM
(#35133068)
But the reason why they'd take a massive haircut if sold today is that when they get the principal back in 10 years it will probably be worth a lot less. Their assets are completely liquid, they're just worth a lot less right now than what they're owed, and for good reason. That the assets might nominally cover the deposits in 10 years is besides the point, the depositors don't want to wait 10 years. Whoever pays to make depositors whole, be it FDIC, tax payers or other banks/bank customers, is transferring real value to the SVB depositors.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by boxed on Monday March 13, 2023 @08:54AM
(#35135045)
> That the assets might nominally cover the deposits in 10 years is besides the point, the depositors don't want to wait 10 years
This would be a problem of liquidity though, which was my original statement.
The bank made mistakes, and their startup assets are a big ? of unrealized losses. But they do have assets, just not liquid.