News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by conradkay on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:05PM (#35129838)
I'm not following your logic here. If there's 10 people each with a $2.5m deposit at a separate bank each and they all spread their accounts to $250k in each of the 10 banks, the FDIC still has a risk of $2.5m per bank right?
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by nemothekid on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:07PM (#35129873)
How likely is it that all 10 banks fail at once?
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by conradkay on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:18PM (#35130001)
Well, my example is for 1 of 10 banks failing but probably somewhat likely without regulations if people panic and start bank runs.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by initplus on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:59PM (#35130407)
Think about this with some numbers: if there are 100 banks, and every business puts 1% of their cash into each bank, the overall risk is the same as if 1% of businesses put 100% of their cash into a random bank out of the 100.

The cost to FDIC if an individual bank fails is the same in both the above scenarios, even though in the first businesses put a lot more effort into spreading out their funds. It looks less like it could have less risk to the FDIC, but really isn’t making any difference.

Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by HWR_14 on Sunday March 12, 2023 @11:17PM (#35130546)
The odds that 100% of businesses each decide to pull their money out of the same bank at the same time is less than 1% of businesses who invested at the same bank pulling out their money. Especially if they are in the same industry and know the same people urging a sudden withdrawal. Maybe even mostly located in the same geographic region.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by naasking on Monday March 13, 2023 @12:51PM (#35138440)
But if the FDIC insures all deposits anyway, then there would never be a bank run to begin with because nobody would panic that they wouldn't get their money out, so spreading risk among multiple banks is a "solution" to an artificial problem.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by HWR_14 on Monday March 13, 2023 @11:17PM (#35146960)
It's a solution to a bank run because of fear of the banks going under. It's not a solution to a bank run because an industry needs cash quickly. For instance, Silvergate had a lot of crypto firms as clients, and in late 2022/early 2023 all those clients needed cash. You can imagine something similar happening in other industries.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by naasking on Tuesday March 14, 2023 @08:41AM (#35150523)
I don't see a problem with a rule or regulation that limits individual daily withdrawal limits. That would solve that specific issue as well, and anybody who needs to withdraw more than that per day clearly has enough funds to have accountants that can coordinate across multiple banks.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa... by lmm on Sunday March 12, 2023 @11:40PM (#35130700)
10 people can go a few days without access to 10% of their money much easier than 1 person can go a few days without access to 100% of their money. And hopefully more customers means more scrutiny for each bank.