Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by firstlink on Sunday March 12, 2023 @09:46PM
(#35129634)
This has been repeated ad nauseam but it does not pass the smell test. If SVB were solvent then it would not be in receivership.
Re:Joint Statement by the Department of the Treasury, Federa...
by evan_ on Sunday March 12, 2023 @10:11PM
(#35129919)
It’s a cash flow issue. Cash flow kills plenty of profitable businesses.
This is not correct. SVB, for example, owes depositors ~$150B but they also have assets of almost $150B. The hole that FDIC needs to fill in may be less than $10B; it may even be zero.