The chance that it would evolve to be as infectious would be greatly reduced. They teach this in first semester immunology.
COVID is a perfect example. It could easily have been significantly more lethal and it was very infectious in its first blush with humanity. What process other than luck prevented it from being both highly lethal and highly contagious rather than moderately lethal and highly contagious?
If you have a reference to a first semester immunology text that supports this supposition I’m very interested to read the justification. Otherwise this feels like a big of an appeal to authority.
Make no mistake, rabies virus also has multiple immune evading mechanisms that are unluckily supercharged in humans.
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6823e1.htm#:~:text=....
CDC says it kills 99% regardless.
Why would it evolve this way?
If I had to guess I’d say rabies had evolutionarily targeted species that today are largely asymptomatic and can easily survive a rabies infection, like bats or birds.