Yes, this is the same for me. The things ChatGTP gets right are often the "common" situations. It's possible you aren't aware of these so surfacing these more "common" facts can be helpful. But ask it a question about an edge case and it will hallucinate a plausible answer, and even double down when you point out a mistake.

By that point it's faster to find an answer by using a few "traditional" search keywords and reading the content yourself.

We can assume it will improve though, it's just not there yet for "edge cases" in it's training data.