It has to be an online service until they get the models more refined and hardware advanced enough that you can run these locally. If you can't run the model locally then it might as well be a service you tie into at the service (eg. github) level. That is, IMO, services are most useful with other services.

I think they are saying the app could be a pre-commit hook where their API is hit before code goes up to remote

Yes. I'm saying that due to this relying on an external service it would be inappropriate for a pre-commit hook as you could only commit while online.

pre-push hook?

git commit --no-verify ?

If the developer wants to slow their own development workflow by delaying the code review, that’s.. concerning.

in what way is your comment pertaining to this thread?

If a user is offline, they are not going to be able to push code for review anyway. Either way, it seems prudent to shift validation and checks closer to the developer, before pushing code. Otherwise you end up with a series of commit & push, wait for check, commit & push fixes, wait for check, commit & push more fixes...

> [...] it would be inappropriate for a pre-commit hook as you could only commit while online.

Why does that matter?

Hey, some of us live in caves.

Add the —no-verify flag when working out of your cave.

to clarify, i mean the processing would still be done remotely, but it could be done earlier in the cycle

No, because that would be way too close to the user, it would be almost impossible to market it as a service you have to pay for ;)

Hmm. Not seeing your argument. The company has an API key. Employees query the local service which passes it up to the pay service. What does user executed vs. github commit triggered have to do with anything? What am I missing?

This solution doesn't require the installation of software, or any changes to the existing workflow.

The bot does not work like a linter or testing framework, these are suggestions that are subject to discussions, and the pull request is a great place to get reviews from the team