News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by beebmam on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:17PM (#35043705)
China has an enormous amount of housing. Their prices are still sky high
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by svachalek on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:20PM (#35043772)
There's a huge cultural difference there though -- people don't trust stocks, bonds, or bank accounts. Housing is the only investment most people will consider.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by hinkley on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:32PM (#35044159)
There are old men who still remember their neighbors being dragged out of those houses, tried, and executed by Mao's kangaroo courts.

Most martial arts schools with ties to China have stories of expatriation or of practicing in the dark in basements.

All those houses bought in Vancouver aren't just about financial investments, they're also a potential bolt-hole if things get ugly again.

Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by btilly on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:02PM (#35044842)
Also those houses are being bought with money being smuggled out of China. For all of the reasons that patio11 gives in https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/money-laundering-and-..., real estate is an excellent investment for money whose provenance you wish to be hard to discover.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by redmorphium on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:17PM (#35045118)
This is a negative way to look at China's history.

As a Chinese-American, whose family and friends all profited greatly from China's rise, I do wonder, how much of that profit was just being lucky enough to support the "winning team," and how much blood was shed on the other side.

I guess the only true mindset is a neutral one.

Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by hinkley on Monday March 06, 2023 @03:27PM (#35047096)
We have a model for that in your birth country (American Civil War). But from my fractured knowledge of Chinese history, there's been a lot less backpedaling vis-a-vis the Civil War on ideological differences between the winning and losing side (and we mostly lament those as regression instead of progress).

In China, things have come back. People who escaped were invited back with promises of better treatment, even given platforms (eg, martial arts) but who knows what we Earthlings have lost from people who didn't. Biomechanics, biology, art, technology, philosophy...

Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by ianlevesque on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:26PM (#35043984)
Nor should they, cultural or not. Look how the government destroyed the Ant group recently. When they can unilaterally do that, how can you find a safe stock?
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by majani on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:19PM (#35045157)
Land in China is all leased from the government, so there's no escaping government risk there without leaving the country
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by pzone on Monday March 06, 2023 @05:14PM (#35048505)
The Chinese situation is caused by government rather than by their culture. Chinese corporations are forced into inefficient state-mandated investments and provide meager rates of returns for shareholders. They get tons of shiny public infrastructure while savers are given nothing, and are not allowed to invest internationally. In other words, it is pure financial repression.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by xboxnolifes on Monday March 06, 2023 @07:24PM (#35049866)
Sounds a lot like the US to me.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by credit_guy on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:20PM (#35043771)
Housing in ghost cities doesn't count. Housing needs to be available where the jobs are.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by pif on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:52PM (#35044625)
I think it's time to reverse the equation: jobs have to be available where housing is!

In other words, we must learn how to improve the economy without turning the cities into antlers.

Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by seunosewa on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:20PM (#35043779)
Why do you think that is?
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by sgt101 on Monday March 06, 2023 @12:29PM (#35044063)
I have an answer: there is nothing else to invest in for the average person.
Re:Maybe Treating Housing as an Investment Was a Colossal Mi... by samstave on Monday March 06, 2023 @01:21PM (#35045198)
When very few can purchase a luxury suit in a ghost city in china, the infra build costs were high, but the available buyer population is way fn low - its inverse to supply&demand when it comes to chinese real estate.

The buyers would have to fund ALL the infra to power, water, feed such ghost city homes, and where will they work?

I used to work with a guy in SF that had a consultancy that would bring chinese 'students' on tours of the US to various universities to have them pick where they wanted to go to school.

These were the children of chinese oligarchs - and they would land in SFO with luggage full of cash - and, not knowing how things worked in the US, would jusr bribe their way through every transaction at ~$10,000 a time...

The chinese oligarchs own more of america than you may know.