News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The moral case against equity language by mrguyorama on Friday March 03, 2023 @12:14PM (#35012354)
Why are you attributing a ranking to an initialism?
Re:The moral case against equity language by chownie on Friday March 03, 2023 @01:46PM (#35013483)
Initialisms apparently naturally have a hierarchy, like when lesbians invented the LGBT and graciously donated the other letters to good causes.
Re:The moral case against equity language by ghodith on Sunday March 05, 2023 @01:03AM (#35027242)
I suppose it would be more similar if it went from "Queer" to "LGPWAQ", as in "Lesbians, gays, and people who are queer".

BIPOC definitely reads like "Black and Indigenous people, and the rest." Which makes sense since the intent of the term is to "center the experiences of Black and Indigenous groups." Can't effectively center something without moving everything else out to the margins.

Re:The moral case against equity language by exolymph on Friday March 03, 2023 @02:41PM (#35014061)
The ranking is the point of the initialism. Black and indigenous people were already included in the blanket term "people of color," so why introduce BIPOC if not to highlight those groups specifically?
Re:The moral case against equity language by rayiner on Friday March 03, 2023 @02:51PM (#35014184)
Exactly--and the Sierra Club guide discloses that exact motivation in the part I quoted above.