The obvious reason is that VW either (a) doesn't want to sell it or (b) wants to retain IP.
I’m picturing some coked out Ford exec screaming at his vp of finance “do we or do we have enough money to buy VW??!”
All of that is reflected in VWs share price. Without all this ‘socialism’ VW could probably easily buy Ford itself, maybe even GM.
Ah, answering my own question, it seems to be called "circular ownership" and while it can sometimes occur from a long history of mergers and acquisitions (Samsung seems to be such a case), its generally a tax dodge or to mask ownership? At least, the top hits I see are all talking about it as a classic way to obscure oligarch ownership and things.
Genuinely curious who actually gets to make the decisions.
sometimes corporate leadership like to do petty things like this at huge cost
They wrote off 7.3B because of Rivian and still no one got fired.
What huge cost?