It's also a great example of how even such a little can go wrong.
The CSS of the second website is wrong, as it uses 'color' without setting 'background-color'. Assuming anything about the default background color is not possible because it is user-configurable in most browsers.
At least http://motherfuckingwebsite.com remains readable when you change your color settings (the second one is completely unreadable on my browser).
You want https://thebestmotherfucking.website
Re:All you may need is HTML
by low_tech_love on Thursday March 02, 2023 @04:48PM
(#35002566)
It’s ok, but it’s already a bit too much. :)
Good point. If the background color changes that often, I'm assuming there's probably a good test out there for that and more.
The text was readable as designed on a white-background. CSS that considers accessibility or print friendly is always good to add.
Re:All you may need is HTML
by brigandish on Thursday March 02, 2023 @09:07PM
(#35004933)
> I'm assuming there's probably a good test out there for that and more.
Javascript test?
Yeah there's lots of a Javascript or css or html validators out there, and likely geared towards checking against a set of best practices.
If it was a javascript that checked for the elements you want to ensure is there that would be neat too, I just wouldn't want it to be just me :)
The balance between design & function can be at odds when the mission of the page is not clear.
For consumption, these are awesome, your brain almost relaxes as it's easier than the usual onslaught.