Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by undersuit on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:05PM (#34989593)

80% of Australian languages are classified as Pama–Nyungan languages. Are you saying they are based off of an Indo-European language?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pama%E2%80%93Nyungan_languages

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by actionfromafar on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:10PM (#34989648)

Dravidian is not indo-european AFAIK.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by undersuit on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:12PM (#34989664)

But no one said Dravidian. Thank you for clearing that up.

Same question: Are you saying they are based off of a Dravidian language?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by runsWphotons on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @07:11PM (#34990207)

I was saying this based on what Ive read previously. It seems the theory is more disputed than I remember but it is consistent with this genetic introgression and other things happening at the time. Whatever the case a lot of things changed circa 5000 years ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by rohan_ on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:07PM (#34989615)

dravidian languages are not indo-european

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by undersuit on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:17PM (#34989725)

The entire country of India doesn't speak only Dravidian languages. You can understand where the confusion comes from right? The person I was replying too didn't say Dravidian, it says Indian languages.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Aboriginal Australian genomes reveal Indian ancestry by rohan_ on Wednesday March 01, 2023 @06:50PM (#34990031)

Sorry for my tone, I didn’t mean to come off as rude. It’s understandable why one would be confused here.

[ Parent | on HN ]